Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Owning the Weather

Back in 1995, a document titled "Owning the Weather in 2025" was submitted to the director of the United States Air Force, under a disguised notion that it was a fictional report and was not intended to be applied to real-life scenarios. The document was a detailed research analysis paper which described the potential of developing aerospace technologies, and more importantly, how they might best be used to harness, control and manipulate the natural forces of weather on this planet.

The technologies and capabilities described in this report have now become a reality, and have been documented all over the world. The "Space Preservation Act of 2001" was introduced on the floor of the House of Representatives by Dennis Kucinich and was an attempt to legislate the use of certain types of advanced weaponry, and not surprisingly, did not pass. Although Kucinich is just another gear in the NWO mechanism, the first-draft edition of this bill contains some very startling admissions to the types of weaponry the United States Air Force has been developing since the end of WWII, including such categories of weaponry as "biological", "electromagnetic", "tectonic", and most disturbingly, "chemtrails."

This film attempts to show that chemtrails are not a hoax, they are real, and they are part of an international conspiracy aimed not only at controlling the elements, but also at ascribing this new technology immediately to war-fighting applications.


Dan said...

I lol'd when they started calling the use of contrails in animated films a program of 'subconcious indoctrination aimed at the american public'. And they wonder why we call these conspiricy theorists crackpots.

I found the little 'evidence' presented very unconvincing but most of the film involved boring minutes long sequences of contrails being filmed...argh, scary, as if somehow showing as many large contrails as they can automatically makes their explantation for them valid.

This documentary is pure shite, don't waste your time.

Anonymous said...

Not the best quality documentary out there, but it raises some interesting questions. I agree with dan for the most part, in that I don't think every "chemtrail" we see is really something nefarious. There must be more going on that we don't understand about how contrails sometimes form into clouds naturally. Maybe the planes are passing though pollution clouds, which would offer nucleation sites for moisture for example. However, the HR bill they show tells me that the military has most likely experimented with the technology, and that's pretty scary. Worth watching if you're into conspiracy stuff, plus its got a pretty good soundtrack, but take it with a grain of salt.

Anonymous said...

No, it's not the best quality doc, and there are loooong minutes showing CHEMTRAILS (insisting they're "contrails" doesn't make it so. Is the DOCUMENTED fact that they hang around ALL DAY, oozing, spreading, filling the skies and turning them to leaden mud, lost on you?! Or is that NORMAL contrail behavior?). Were you two – “Anonymous” and "Dan" -- WATCHING? PAYING ANY ATTENTION? Dr. Carnicon goes into great detail about what makes a contrail; what makes a cloud; and why, therefore, these chemtrails CANNOT be either. "Chemtrails" are mentioned, BY NAME, in H.R. 2977, a bill proposing to BAN THEM, among many other, well-known, existing, "exotic" weapon systems. The bill FAILED -- TWICE!! People don't try to ban WHAT DOESN'T EXIST! And BTW, at 38.28 minutes, # 3 on the H. R. 2977 list, “High altitude, low frequency, weapons systems” – where the narrator says, “I don’t even know what that is!” – is probably HAARP. These weapons EXIST. It’s willful, irrational blindness to insist they don’t in the face of all contrary evidence. Do you believe the earth is flat? If not, why not? Since, apparently, evidence doesn’t matter to you.

And, uh, did you ever see a contrail in, say, a Bugs Bunny cartoon? No? Why not? Because they're normal & innocuous. Therefore, it just never even occurred to the cartoonists to include them. So, why include them in Disney films? What IS the point of that? And what about that billboard by Spirit Aerodynamics? What the heck is THAT about? The sky on that billboard -- that looks *normal* to you? Gawd, & you call us crackpots. Fine. Better than being F'NG MORONS!

Quit masquerading your desperate need to not see what's in front of you as rationality. It's willful blindness. To quote a character from an Agatha Christie mystery: "I believe the only unforgivable sin is willful stupidity." Amen -- if the shoe fits . . .